Saturday, September 17, 2011

Tools

At least three times in as many days, I've been asked some variation of "What would you do if you broke your camera/it died?"

People seem to expect me to cringe at the thought - as though I can't possibly bear the thought of my (admittedly beautiful) equipment biting the dust.

I find that a bit odd. A camera to me is just like any other tool, whether that's a hammer, my pocket knife, or the pens and pencils I use in my everyday schoolwork. I don't baby or coddle any of my gear. I take it all out into the wet and the cold and the mud and the dust just as easily as I take it out on a beautiful Saturday morning like today.

One bag of my tools

My theory behind tools: If it can't do what I ask of it and take a beating in the process - I need better tools. If a tool breaks, why spend all day crying and moaning about it? Get a better one and keep hammering, cutting, writing, and shooting.

This same mentality is why I find the whole "Canon vs Nikon" debate absurd. I don't care which hammer or pen you use - why should you care which one I use? Why does it matter to anyone how many megapixels I have or whether my lens is Sigma or Nikkor? It doesn't matter one freaking bit. In fact, when a photographer comes up to me and says "Oh man, what are you shooting with? The D300s? That's pretty cool. I shoot the D90. Nikon's just better, ya know?" All I can think is about how that photographer clearly hasn't figured "it" out yet.

More of my tools

I know, I shouldn't look down on those people - I used to do the same thing. The difference is now, I've learned that the tools aren't what matter - the results are.

...and in case you're wondering, I have literally used my camera as a hammer before.

3 comments:

MarkeyMarkBeaty said...

haha frick yea! I liked that

Simon Hucko said...

I think this is a result of the "nice camera = nice photos" perception. People see your big nice camera and assume that you wouldn't be able to do the same work without it. Not true.

That having been said, unless you have the means ($$, insurance) to replace your gear if it breaks, it can be a real heartbreaker when your $1500 camera or lens dies...

matt beaty said...

Simon,

The idea of a "heartbreaker" is exactly what I don't get. At all. If my gear dies and I don't have insurance (which would suck), I would use it as an opportunity to see what smaller, cheaper gear I could buy to fulfill the same creative goals...

I guess I'm just not attached to my stuff the way most of us creatives are!